Why it matters
Not every metric should behave the same way in a quarter or year summary.- A revenue line often needs a summed total.
- A headcount line often needs an end-of-period view.
- A percentage or rate often needs to be recalculated or weighted, not summed.
Aggregation versus rollups
It helps to separate two related concepts:Time rollupsdecide which lower-level periods belong together.Time aggregationdecides what value should represent that grouped result.
Common aggregation patterns
Use the business meaning of the metric to guide the rule:Flow metricssuch as revenue, expense, and units sold often make sense as sums.Point-in-time metricssuch as end-of-month headcount, cash balance, or open pipeline often make more sense as an ending value.Rates and percentagesoften need a weighted or recomputed result instead of a simple period sum.
How to choose the right behavior
Ask these questions for each important metric:- Is this metric additive across time?
- Is this metric a balance at a point in time?
- Would a reviewer expect a period-end number or a blended number?
- Does the quarter or year view tell the same story as the monthly view?
Examples
Revenue
Revenue is usually a flow metric, so quarter and year views typically sum the lower-level periods.Headcount
Headcount often behaves like an end-of-period metric. A yearly summary usually needs to show the closing value or another clearly defined business interpretation, not the sum of all months.Margin percentage
A margin percentage usually should not be summed across periods. Review whether the summary should be recalculated from the underlying values instead.Troubleshooting a wrong quarter or year total
If a higher-level value looks wrong, check these in order:- confirm the metric’s business meaning
- confirm the grouped periods are correct in the rollup
- review whether the actual and planned formulas behave differently around the cutoff
- recheck any dimensions or filters applied in the view

